Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)

Catalogue drawing: A framing device for design thinking

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v1i1.6
Published
2021-04-30
Article downloads
30
Submitted
2021-04-29

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of catalogue drawing as a framing device to aid design thinking in the architectural design process. Catalogue drawing has been largely understood as a representation of the finished and curated design output. However, it is argued that catalogue drawing enables designers to handle, arrange, and process information, assisting them to frame this information for different needs of design discovery. This paper analyses the catalogue drawings produced by first-year Bachelor of Architecture Programme students in Universitas Indonesia in doing their first creative making project. The study highlights four categories of catalogue drawings with various roles, from catalogue drawing intended to capture the relevant information, investigate the particularities, create a bigger picture of the design condition, and outline the design proposition. The study found that each catalogue drawings were often repeated in loops throughout the design process, enabling the students to incrementally generate original design works. This study underlines the role of catalogue drawing in revealing the progression of design thinking that is often hidden throughout the architectural design process.

References

  1. Allen, S. (2006). Tracing elements. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Tracing Eisenman: Complete works (pp. 49–89). Rizzoli.

  2. Bordeleau, A., & Bresler, L. (2010). Drawing the map: Siting architecture. Footprint, 7, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.4.2.725

  3. Buchanan, R. (2009). Wicked problems in design thinking. In H. Clark & D. Brody (Eds.), Design studies: A reader (pp. 96–102). Berg Publishers.

  4. Eisenman, P. (1999). Diagram diaries. Thames & Hudson Ltd.

  5. Fraser, M., & Rattenbury, K. (2010). The Archigram Archival Project. http://archigram.westminster.ac.uk/about.php?pg=aap

  6. Garcia, M. (2010). Introduction: Histories and theories of the diagrams of architecture. In M. Garcia (Ed.), The diagrams of architecture: AD reader (pp. 18–45). Wiley.

  7. Hawley, C. (2013). Transitions: Concepts + drawings + buildings. Routledge.

  8. Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Routledge.

  9. Lending, M. (2015). Promenade among words and things: The gallery as catalogue, the catalogue as gallery. Architectural Histories, 3(1):20, 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ah.da

  10. Murray, S. (2013). Design research: Translating theory into practice. In M. Fraser (Ed.), Design research in architecture: An overview (pp. 95–116). Ashgate Publishing Limited.

  11. Powers, M. (2007). Toward a discipline-dependent scholarship. Journal of Architectural Education, 61(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00122.x

  12. Schon, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

  13. Tschumi, B. (1981). The Manhattan transcripts (2nd ed.). Wiley.

  14. Tschumi, B. (2014). Notations: Diagrams and sequences. Artifice Books on Architecture.

  15. Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and contradiction in architecture (2nd ed.). The Museum of Modern Art.

  16. Verbeke, J. (2013). This is research by design. In M. Fraser (Ed.), Design research in architecture: An overview (pp. 137–160). Ashgate Publishing Limited.

  17. Vidler, A. (2000). Diagrams of diagrams: Architectural abstraction and modern representation. Representations, 72, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2902906

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.