Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)

Expanding agency: The mapping of architectural design discourse in Indonesia's academic publications

Published
2021-04-30

Abstract

Architectural academic publications are essentials elements in defining and establishing the architecture academic discourses in institutional context. A critical, retrospective reading of past and present architectural publications could reveal the current development of the field and provide an empirical basis for future actions. This paper digitally maps the notion of ‘design’ within the published articles in Indonesian architectural journals from the past decade to understand the current situation and present the country’s challenges in developing the architectural design discourse. Through consideration of architectural academic journals’ role in establishing the field’s boundary, a bibliometric mapping was performed on a corpus of 1031 abstracts collected from prominent Indonesian architectural journals. This paper reflects on the extracted key terms from the corpus through different mapping strategies using bibliometric analysis methods. From the mapping findings, and by extending the notion of design as a transformative agency in architecture, this paper retrospectively suggests a more diverse, creative, and provocative development of design discourse in Indonesian architectural academic scholarship.

References

  1. Allen, S. (2009). Practice: Architecture, Technique + Representation. Routledge.

  2. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2021). Urban interiority: Emerging cultural and spatial practices. Interiority, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v4i1.131

  3. Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. Routledge.

  4. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360102

  5. Bryant, C., Rodgers, C., & Wigfall of alma‐nac, T. (2018). The changing forms and values of architectural practice. Architectural Design, 88(5), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2336

  6. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

  7. Chai, K.-H., & Xiao, X. (2012). Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of design studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, 33(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.004

  8. Corner, J. (1999). The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings. Reaktion Books.

  9. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Huo, X., & Owusu-Manu, D.-G. (2019). A scientometric analysis and visualisation of global green building research. Building and Environment, 149, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059

  10. Demirel, E. (2009). The renewable tradition: Le Corbusier and the East. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(3–4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135510000096

  11. Downton, P. (2003). Design Research. RMIT Publishing.

  12. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

  13. Forty, A. (2000). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames & Hudson.

  14. Geng, D., Feng, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Sustainable design for users: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 29824–29836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09283-1

  15. Ghosn, R., & Jazairy, E. H. (2018). Geostories: Another architecture for the environment. Actar.

  16. Gray, D. (2019). Tweeting about women: A critical discourse analysis of International Women's Day on Twitter [Ph.D., Cardiff University]. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/137810/

  17. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.

  18. Harahap, M. M. Y., Tregloan, K., & Nervegna, A. (2019). Rationality and creativity interplay in research by design as seen from the inside. Interiority, 2(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.65

  19. Jencks, C. (2000). Jencks's theory of evolution: An overview of twentieth-century architecture. Architectural Review, 208(1241), 76–79.

  20. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed). Elsevier/Architectural Press.

  21. Lawson, B. (2009). What designers know (repr). Elsevier/Architectural Press.

  22. LISIS. (2021). CorText Manager. https://managerv2.cortext.net

  23. Luck, R. (2019). Design research, architectural research, architectural design research: An argument on disciplinarity and identity. Design Studies, 65, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.001

  24. Marvuglia, A., Havinga, L., Heidrich, O., Fonseca, J., Gaitani, N., & Reckien, D. (2020). Advances and challenges in assessing urban sustainability: An advanced bibliometric review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124, 109788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109788

  25. McGrath, B. (2018). Architectural localism as damage control in the face of globalism and digitisation. Architectural Design, 88(5), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2342

  26. Mhearáin, A. N., & Kennedy, T. (2020). Reframing social value in 20th-century conservation. Architectural Design, 90(4), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2596

  27. Oliveira, O. J. de, Silva, F. F. da, Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: An essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects. Scientometrics Recent Advances. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856

  28. Parnell, S. (2018). Architecture’s expanding field: AD magazine and the post-modernisation of architecture. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 22(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135518000295

  29. Parnell, S., & Sawyer, M. (2020). In search of architectural magazines. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135520000457

  30. Picon, A. (2020). Beyond digital avant-gardes: The materiality of architecture and its impact. Architectural Design, 90(5), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2618

  31. Plowright, P. D. (2014). Revealing architectural design: Methods, frameworks and tools. Routledge.

  32. Till, J. (2009). Architecture depends. MIT Press.

  33. Valese, M., & Natta, H. (2020). Digital urban narratives: The images of the city in the age of big data. IN_BO. Ricerche e Progetti per Il Territorio, La Città e l’architettura, 11(15), 68-79-68–79. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/10532

  34. Wagner, I. (2000). Persuasive artefacts in architectural design and planning. In S. A. R. Scrivener, L. J. Ball, & A. Woodcock (Eds.), Collaborative Design (pp. 379–389). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0779-8_36

  35. Zeisel, J., & Eberhard, J. P. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning (Revised ed.). W. W. Norton.